Paragraph in Legal Terms

This is incorrect because paragraph (b) is not read grammatically with the introductory words. As already mentioned, it is customary in England to refer to “clauses” and “paragraphs” and “paragraphs” of a contract. The terms “sections” and “articles” are generally used only when referring to laws and laws in general. The statutes are divided into parts, sections, subsections, paragraphs and subparagraphs. In addition, the main text of the statutes may be supplemented by lists divided into paragraphs and subparagraphs. In your work, you can use abbreviations to refer to specific sections of the legislation. The abbreviations to be used are listed below: it is incorrect because subparagraph (a) is a sentence while subparagraph (b) is a clause. The following example is also incorrect, as subparagraph (a) modifies the verb “issue” and subparagraph (b) modifies the noun “license”: the second of these drawbacks may disappear as readers become more accustomed to seeing the text in a bulleted format that reflects much of the logic of the traditional paragraphs used in legal texts. In fact, for many readers, it`s now an argument for using paragraphs. This is wrong because each paragraph contains elements that refer to two different things in the introductory words. Verbs that begin with “manufactured” and “imported” refer to “widgets,” while word expressions beginning with “is payable” refer to “tax.” The word phrase “is payable” in paragraph (a) interferes with the reading of paragraph (b), which begins to shift attention to “widgets”. A similar problem occurs when a stand-alone clause is included in a paragraph, as in the following example: Another way to detect an equivalence problem is to check whether the conjunction between paragraphs would occur in ordinary language.

In the two examples just mentioned, it would not be used. If you specify a paragraph or subsection as part of a section, use only the section`s abbreviation. For example, section 15 (1) (b) of the Human Rights Act 1998 reads as follows: The sentence in subparagraph (b) should be moved to a lower section or other subsection as follows: Use the full form at the beginning of a sentence (e.g. “Schedule” or “Section”) or if you are referring to a part of a law, without repeating the name of the law. Elsewhere in the text, both forms can be used, although you normally use the abbreviation when referring to subsections or paragraphs. Use the abbreviated form in all footnotes. The following example illustrates the paragraph hierarchy and the punctuation and indentation used: But then he goes on to say that by “paragraph” the subsentences can be divided into “paragraphs” and “paragraphs” – what I collectively call clauses listed in tabular form. “Paragraph” is a standard term, but I prefer the other term for that, “tabulation”: In everyday language, it is accepted that a paragraph consists of one or more whole sentences, while a tabular bulleted sentence is only part of a sentence. For the same reason, I am not talking about paragraphs and paragraphs.

One way to test problems of this nature is to try to read the regulations without the paragraph divisions. If the syntax is not grammatical, there are problems. There are a number of rules for the rejection of legal texts. Text readability is also improved because paragraph design increases white space on the page. However, it also has disadvantages because. under section 11 § 1A of the Limitation Act 1980. The tax is levied at the rate provided on widgets, parallel units may not contain full rates, as in the following example: . Section 5 § 1 (a) of the Race Relations Act 1976. Race Relations Act 1976, section 5 (1) (a). There are several ways to refer to sections of the act in the text of your document.

For example, yesterday I gave another of my Osgoode professional development seminars in Toronto to eighty sold-out audiences. During a break, I discussed with one of the participants how to call the components of the contract body. In a follow-up email, she had this to say on the subject: Paragraph is hierarchical in that a particular unit can be divided into other units. In federal legislation, the numbering and terminology used to designate units at each level are as follows: If you are quoting part of a statute in a footnote, insert a comma after the year and a space, but no period between the abbreviation and the initial number, letter or opening parenthesis. Example: A parallel unit may refer to things mentioned in the previous unit, as in the following example: The Minister may reduce the maximum number if the licence holder catches more than that number of fish. The parallel units are all indented in the same way by the introductory words and numbered in the same line. Parallel units may be followed by a middle or bottom section (resulting in a “sentence sandwich”), but each unit must be grammatically legible with the middle or bottom section, or the middle or bottom section must be a complete sentence. Please note that you should always refer to the policies of the department or school you received. My other problem is that it is inaccurate in two respects to refer to tabular sub-articles. First, a single sentence in tabular form, and a subset may well consist of more than one sentence. Second, the sentence presented in tabular form could appear either in an article or in a paragraph (i.e.

an article or paragraph).